As a US Navy veteran, I'm amused to see developments in this once very traditional branch of the service. When I served, there was a saying that the Navy was "200 years of tradition untouched by progress."
Much has changed. Women now serve on ships (unthinkable in my day). Openly gay service personnel (that was a disqualifier for service until recently). Increased (even generous) benefits and amenities.
Despite all that, the Navy kept many of its traditions and its "esprit de corps."
A relatively recent change may be a symbol that the unique esprit of the Navy is eroding.
The Navy has introduced (drum roll) blue camouflage work uniforms. I suspect they did this because Navy personnel see their counterparts in the Army and Marines with camouflage ... and are envious because the uniforms are "cool." Of course, there is a reason for camouflage in the services with ground operations. They are, literally, meant to provide cover. What's the purpose in the Navy?
One wag commenting on this change noted: If you fall overboard, the last thing you want is camouflage!"
So, will the U.S. go the way of Canada and other foreign services with a single uniform for all branches of the military. That eliminates the "envy" factor, but it certainly reduces the sense of identity and esprit de corps which has been a hallmark of military professionalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment